| A few things - the citation is quite irrelevant when the information is true, so it's not a point worth raising. In a way - and if the Post is the only place that reported on this, then your adding credence to my argument that the media is biased. Thanks. >Then, you take fault with the author expressing their opinion that the festival had "an overwhelming show of force. No, I take issue with the authors insinuation that it wasn't warranted, hence: "overwhelming show of force in response to a comparatively small number of bad actors." >Is that all the author complained about in this respect? Have you actually read the article? It's probably one silliest pieces of journalism I've ever read. Just read something of quotes: >“The gentrifiers are not wanting to share—they’re wanting to take over.” One of the tools they can use to take over public spaces, he argues, is law enforcement. Yes, law enforcement is a tool of the "gentrifiers" to move poor people out. This is ridiculous. It's not the crimes that are the problem (homicides, assaults, drug dealing, public intoxication), but rather the "criminalization" of the criminals. I guess the solution is just stop calling the cops? >If this is the awful, biased "liberal" media you're worried about, you should probably stick to the Post. That way all of your existing biases can be reinforced. Okay. |