Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ghaff 3100 days ago
I'm pretty sure the opposite is true. Many people are already invested in stocks and, even in the .com bubble, many had accounts with etrade and the like--some of which were part of the bubble itself. All you had to do was transfer your cash/stocks to pets.com or whatever.

With bitcoin, you have to sign up for/transfer money to various sketchy exchanges that you've never previously used.

2 comments

E trade and Ameritrade were new companies at the time. Buying stocks on your own without your bank/a brokerage was not commonplace actually and that was a pretty substantial barrier to entry.
Well, those are brokerages. I assume what you mean is that it was more common to call your broker on the phone and place an order (at a fairly high fee in most cases). That's fair. Even in the US, online trading really came in contemporaneously with the dot-com era. That said, even the newish online brokerages were regulated to a degree we don't see with cryptocurrencies.
Yes that's a more accurate characterization.
What are you talking about? Most people in the world barely have access to buy stocks, especially US stocks, without not-so-minor annoyances.