|
|
|
|
|
by zie
3105 days ago
|
|
I would argue the biggest strength is maintainability. Managing and keeping up a distributed cluster with k8s is WORK. If you are not at the scale where you can dedicate full-time staff to managing only k8s, you shouldn't even be touching k8s. You need full-time staff to keep it alive. Nomad is operationally simple, you can run it out of your normal devops roles, you don't need dedicated staff. Mostly because you can pretty easily wrap your head around what it does and how it works. This saves you bundles of cash and time. |
|