|
|
|
|
|
|
by solidsnack9000
3110 days ago
|
|
|
...is to believe that all the accusers are lying. For those I don't believe in holding the accusers guilty until proven innocent... You've used this kind of phrasing a few times, but strictly speaking, not believing the accuser is not the same as accusing them of any crime -- being wrong is a not a crime. It seems to me that you are saying, that practically speaking we either hold the accused guilty-until-proven-innocent, or we hold the accusers guilty-until-proven-innocent -- we have have to make a choice, in the absence of proof. Is my understanding correct? |
|
|