Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stablemap 3107 days ago
https://twitter.com/Woodshedagency/status/943508162002513923
3 comments

"These Tweets are protected Only approved followers can see @Woodshedagency's Tweets. To request access, click Follow. Learn more."

This does not exactly make them look like innocent above board victims of libel.

They've now posted their response, and if true, everything on their side makes sense, and makes this situation a good example of not 100% trusting one sided accusations without having the other side's version first.
Well, it is rather annoying to be crabbed at like I was on a witch hunt. I also wrote this comment which was downvoted into the negatives and remains at zero:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971899

The witch-hunt atmosphere in this thread is not my doing. Other people chose to upvote comments that agreed with the one sided smear campaign and downvote anything arguing for a more evenhanded approach.

Please note the final paragraph of that comment was added after it was downvoted into the negatives and initially was prefaced with "I have no idea why this is being downvoted, but... "

So I feel rather aggravated with my entire experience of this discussion. Get downvoted for an evenhanded comment, then later get lectured for a different one that could be framed as agreement with the smear campaign.

Not to self: Maybe I need to just avoid mudslinging discussions on HN lest I get mud slung all over me, no matter what I do. Trying to be a voice of reason in the face of this crap apparently does not do any good at all.

For a PR agency I'd consider this as officially "going to ground."
I did not know this expression. For others who might not know it:

https://britishisms.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/go-to-ground/

Yeah. They’ve gone completely to ground. I am guessing in the hopes it will blow over before it becomes bigger.

They claimed in a tweet earlier today that they were preparing a response however the fact they locked off their channel seems to imply their response is duck and cover.

Thanks for summarizing it—I didn’t anticipate their locking the account.
"Sorry, you are not authorized to see this status."