[criddell]

> Why don’t you see consumers or some other group besides the local taxi interest taking them to court?

I've always seen Uber as a taxi service and I have no interest in taking them to court. I've never been tempted to take a traditional taxi service to court either though.

I don't think that really matters though. What is a taxi service? My dictionary says a taxicab is a car licensed to transport passengers in return for payment of a fare. That fits pretty closely to how I use Uber, so I'm fine with calling it a taxi service. It's a duck-typing perspective I guess.

[HelloNurse]

Same activity, same regulations. It isn't a complex legal principle.