| This is less useful than you think. What you need is the ability to look at a problem and solve it. Understanding the problem is a lot harder than most people (technical experts) realise. Far too often, the technical expert solves a problem on the basis of their current solution space tools and not what the actual problem requires. In other words, they cannot think outside of the solution space box they are stuck in. Knowing that there are all sorts of algorithms available for all sorts of variations of problems and knowing where you can get the information to implement a solution to your problem is a lot better than being able to reel off one or two algorithms and not know that there are other solutions. Over the decades, I have become involved with various projects that were created by "programming guru's". They knew the systems involved and made solutions that showed off their "guru-bility". The problem - well the systems were a nightmare to make changes to. They used "industry standard" practise and supplied a solution that forced people to change how they did their business, without actually considering the business at hand. One such system was built using dynamically generated SQL. Had the original "guru" actually thought more carefully about the problem in hand, no dynamically generated SQL would have been needed and making changes to the system would not have been difficult. In that particular case, I was there doing "after the fact" technical and functional specs. As part of my package of documentation, I included a specification for rebuilding the entire system so that it would be very easy to maintain and change and the runtime for each system run would have been (on my estimates) reduced to about 5% or less on then runtime of 25 hours. To get everything back on track generally required rewrites (sometimes complete rewrites) to be able to extend these systems. It is our responsibility to enhance the end-user experience not make life easy for ourselves. |