|
|
|
|
|
by majormajor
3109 days ago
|
|
I think you're missing the point entirely. If your business is such that a tax penalty on a breach would make you no longer able to afford to do business, then you have two options:
1) don't store the data in the first place - your risk no goes to 0
2) scrap your business plan as the cost of holding the data given the impossibility of preventing every breach is greater than the economic value it would generate Today you don't have to really think about what the cost of losing the data is because your portion of it is 0. That's stupid. It's like every startup deciding to include a new type of coffee machine that includes a small nuclear reactor - sure, we can't prevent all possible disaster scenarios, but the marketing people and data people REALLY LIKE having this type of coffee available, and the government isn't giving us any reason NOT to have it, so why not?! So if a tax either makes you put money aside to account for the risk, or shuts down a bunch of frivolous examples of personal data collection, it's solved a huge part of the problem. |
|