Unfortunately not distinct enough to base your whole argument upon...
My theory is if one can demonstrate how the distinction between "monetary capital" and "physical capital" doesn't cause other parts of the economy theory to become false then the underlying argument is probably false.
And one can safely assume that anyone who quotes Schumpeter is probably wrong.
My theory is if one can demonstrate how the distinction between "monetary capital" and "physical capital" doesn't cause other parts of the economy theory to become false then the underlying argument is probably false.
And one can safely assume that anyone who quotes Schumpeter is probably wrong.