|
|
|
|
|
|
by Johnny555
3109 days ago
|
|
|
But like I said, my internet bandwidth + quota is not high enough to replace my fileserver with cloud hosting, so I'd still have that expense -- and the $25/month fileserver also acts as a security camera recorder, a media server and a few other things, so it's more than a fileserver. And yeah, S3 is not a fileserver replacement,AWS's best solution for that would be EFS, but that'd cost me $900/month for my usage. |
|
|