[le_zonzon]

> I only read 2 pages.

So you are evaluating the quality of a 28 pages paper by reading only the introduction ?

Are you intentionally retarded ?

[logicallee]

I didn't evaluate the quality of the paper. I only evaluated whether it's intentionally indecipherable.

I did glance through some more of the paper, though I did not read it carefully.

I didn't find anything that tripped any of my criteria, mentioned beforehand, for whether it's an intentionally indecipherable paper: did you see anything like that?

Please note that this is not an endorsement of the paper.