[yesenadam]

Well, evidently I don't think it's invalid. Just asserting that doesn't achieve much. I haven't given this a great deal of thought, but it seems the specific emotions are so far irrelevant; what is relevant is whether an action causes harm, or may be predicted to do so/usually does so.

[austincheney]

> Well, evidently I don't think it's invalid.

Fortunately, courts in the US do not have trouble discerning this difference.

[yesenadam]

Maybe if you made your points on here without seeming offensively snarky in your every sentence, you might have more success. "Don't be snarky."