[fundingshovel]

No, but the report is about journal voucher adjustments which isn't spending exactly spending.

The report says not that they're "spending" $21T, but that they made a cumulative amount of errors and corrections in their vouchers equalling $21T and have really poor audit controls.

While bad audit controls is a legitimate and serious problem, it very much is not the same as what people normally think of as "Spending".

[roganp]

But these are adjustments that are larger than the entire (associated) budget. How is even possible? How do poor controls lead to these astronomical errors?