|
|
|
|
|
by FabHK
3114 days ago
|
|
There is some argument about terminology, whether the notion of blockchain includes the peer-to-peer distribution and consensus mechanism (eg proof-of-work) or not. (In my view, it shouldn't.) Git uses a somewhat extended version of a blockchain (a directed acyclic graph instead of just a linked list). I think it's a cool technology, and has many applications where you want an immutable sequence of records. But it's not a panacea, and the current hype is overblown. |
|
I've been messing around with using a blockchain for storing DNS records, I think it's a neat idea, but the overhead is pretty large considering the small amount of data that is involved.