|
|
|
|
|
by chiaro
3108 days ago
|
|
>That is not why this is shocking. This proceeding is shocking because the legal basis for this change is dependent on a false statements about the technology involved. It goes beyond just, "Republicans prefer deregulation," or, "Republicans favor market-based approaches." There is plenty of room and a general need for debates about what policy approaches are best, but there is no room for debate about the answer to technical questions. Haha. Try working in education or, gasp, environmental science, if you think that the contestability of simple facts is shocking. |
|
The best thing you can do is realize everyone is an idiot and think for yourself rather than the party.