[sudojudo]

Just a guess, but it's probably because PS and GIMP are huge projects with years of work put into them -by teams of people. This is one guy. Not saying I don't welcome some competition in this area, but there are already tons of PS clones, all with their own niche.

Put it in the context of operating systems, and the guy was saying "This is the next Windows." That would be laughable.

Again though, good for him, fight the giants. But, he's got to expect some eye-rolls and giggles when making such lofty claims.

[fardo]

>Put it in the context of operating systems, and the guy was saying "This is the next Windows." That would be laughable.

That happened in real life!

Consider what the launch of Linux looked like:

http://www.thelinuxdaily.com/2010/04/the-first-linux-announc...

It’s reasonable to think a hobby project won’t get big, and saying it will certainly is talking a big game before it’s actually happened, but even in the OS counterexample you provided, strange things can happen.

Some side projects die, and some side project ends up taking over the majority of the server and all of the supercomputer OS market.

[overcast]

Linux is not the next Windows, and will never be the next Windows. It's been the year of the Linux desktop for twenty years, and it's not been achieved yet. It's very good for the server environment, but it was the next Unix, not the next Windows.

[disordinary]

You're wrong, but not in the way that you think.

The concept of a desktop operating system is dying.

Different distros of Linux are very capable desktop operating systems, they are fully featured and competitive with Windows in pretty much every facet. They may not be the next Windows but that doesn't matter. 95% of the use case for an OS now days is the ability to run a modern web browser.

Regardless, you shouldn't dismiss something just because it doesn't have mass adoption. Mass adoption doesn't necessarily reflect the amount of engineering and quality of the platform.

The whole Windows vs Linux debate is pretty much obsolete and becoming less relevant every day.

[Retric]

Linux is already running on more personal computers than Windows. We call them tablets, phones, and think of Android as it's own OS but the reality is it all came from just one guy at the beginning.

[foxylad]

If you define "the next Windows" as the operating system that supersedes Windows, then Android (based on the Linux kernel) arguably fits the bill.

But Linux being the next windows or not, the point here is that one guy's hobby project can change the world, so dismissing something because it's just one guy is dangerous. I have seen many cases where one passionate developer has produced something a large corporate team would be proud of.

[Const-me]

> probably because PS and GIMP are huge projects with years of work put into them -by teams of people

Just because someone spent millions on a software doesn’t mean it’s impossible to do the same for multiple orders of magnitude less. An extreme example, AT&T spent millions on their Unix, but nowadays many CS university students recreate an OS in the corresponding OS design class.

Going back to Photoshop, PS is written in C++, it contains decades of legacy code, its first version was designed to run on 7MHz CPU with 128 KB RAM. Another things is, it contains rarely used stuff (e.g. legacy formats support) and also stuff irrelevant for web (such as COM automation interface).