|
|
|
|
|
by cosmosa
3114 days ago
|
|
I am currently 60% through the GT omscs program. I’d say it’s good for your money. So far I have been unimpressed with the quality of the recorded lectures both compared to other recorded lectures and on campus lectures. Group projects are a pain. The focuses especially in ML are weak, you really have to do a lot of work on your own in order to be competent in a specialization. Because of the lack of courses they offer I’ve ended up taking 3 / 6 courses which I didn’t need to take or enjoy taking. I’d say it’s best if you want to get a well rounded overview of some modern trends in cs rather than focusing on any specialization. |
|
Totally agree with this. For courses like AI, ML, and RL, I watched lectures from Berkeley and Stanford in addition to the GT lectures, and that really helped me understand it better.
> get a well rounded overview of some modern trends in cs
That's usually the case for a master's. PhDs are more in-depth.