Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sametmax 3111 days ago
I really wonder if people said to lincoln something like:

"Please don't end slavery. The whole economy depends on it. Hell my brother would be out of a job. We would loose half the states in the next vote if you do. Be reasonable mate. There is probably a middle way that can make everyone happy."

Everytime there is an important question raised, it will be hard on the system, on the habits and traditions, and on the ones implementing the new thing.

This can not be a reason not to do it.

Now there could be very good reasons no to do it. Like discovering the whole specie would degenerate if we did.

But "we always have been doing this" should never be a answer in a civilized debate.

Let's talk about this. What are the fact ? What is the price we are paying now from eating that much meat. What would be the benefit and price of stopping ? Is it worth it ?

Otherwise it's just a Facebook talks.

2 comments

People probably did. Plus it was ultimately decided by a bloody civil war that still has lasting cultural and mental consequences to this current day.

So do you really believe eating meat is at the same level as human slavery , or is it an argument to ridiculousness.

My point was we should not ignore the human cultural consequences in our logical calculus, humans aren't purely rational actors .

> So do you really believe eating meat is at the same level as human slavery , or is it an argument to ridiculousness.

I'm just using humor to state that if an issue is important, there will always be those type of argument. We should not stop at them. Taking them in consideration is obviously the right thing, but those can't be definitive show stoppers.

Otherwise the status quo will always win since by definition all our systems are built around what we are doing right now.

Eating meat is not comparable to slavery, and that's really all that needs to be said in response to this.

Is this actually supposed to be a serious platform plank? Not seeing how this will draw more than a pittance of a vote - maybe 5%. It's an extreme minority view, on par with "literal communism now".