So, your problem is that Swift's syntax in general isn't to your tastes, not the list comprehension proposal as such? Fair enough, but that's not what you were saying.
> Fair enough, but that's not what you were saying.
Then tell me, what was I saying?
>> I see very little connection, and I've seen list comprehensions in several different languages.
And then...
> So, your problem is [...] not the list comprehension proposal as such?
...you should get off your high horse. Your juggling with math terminology
earlier is not impressive. I know you wanted to sound smart, but you overdid
it and got smartass instead.
Let me rephrase then: what you seemed to be saying.
> ...you should get off your high horse. Your juggling with math terminology earlier is not impressive.
I'm not sure where you got that impression. I learned about Cartesian products in high school. Everything else I was talking about is at most first year computer science stuff.
I was simply trying to be precise, using the most basic terminology I could think of.
Then tell me, what was I saying?
>> I see very little connection, and I've seen list comprehensions in several different languages.
And then...
> So, your problem is [...] not the list comprehension proposal as such?
...you should get off your high horse. Your juggling with math terminology earlier is not impressive. I know you wanted to sound smart, but you overdid it and got smartass instead.