[snarf21]

Very true. I've found at every company that I've worked at that a "bad" process followed consistently by everyone always outperforms the "perfect" process followed haphazardly. This reminds me of the recent threads about people using Excel instead of "real" software. At the end of the day, you are trying to add value. As long as you aren't adding technical debt or other risks, the how matters much less.

[seanmcdirmid]

Taking on technical debt isn’t necessarily a problem, zero debt methodologies are the worst! The ones that acknowledge debt as necessary and so deal with it are much better.