Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by thogenhaven 3115 days ago
We almost went with contentful when we chose a headless cms. But their pricing for large multilingual sites was through the roof.

Directus is an open source alternative that has the same features for free. So we wet with this. Very happy with this CMS.
3 comments
Sujan 3114 days ago
Played with Directus a bit today.

The "Create content model" UI is definitely not as polished as the one from Contentful or Kentico Cloud - but it works. You have to actually manage relationship tables yourself, which some people might like.

Unfortunately their only trial is for the smaller plan which is limited to 3 tables, and I don't have the energy and motivation to install the Open Source version...

Still interesting.

link
gregwebs 3114 days ago
yeah, pricing did not make sense for us. We went with Kentico Cloud (hosted, but it is also open source that you can deploy).
link
sedojj 3114 days ago
Kentico Cloud hosts the content inventory/management part, the frontend is hosted on your end. Not aware of any possibilty to host content management part yourself.
link
Sujan 3114 days ago
> but it is also open source that you can deploy

Do you have a link for that? I couldn't find anything about self hosting.

(But I did check it out, and it definitely is quite capable!)

link
Sujan 3114 days ago
I asked Kentico Cloud support, this was their reply.

> Kentico Cloud is a SaaS model, so you need to host the application that consumes data from it. I'm not aware of an option where you would host the content management application.

So no self hosted option.

link
Cyberdog 3115 days ago
I'm looking at the awful web site[0] for Directus, and it sure has a lot of screenshots of what appears to be a fairly traditional web-based CMS UI.

I get that what we're seeing may just be a front-end "app" connecting to the core headless CMS via its own API, but at what point has your "headless CMS with a nice UI" just become another traditional CMS?

[0]: https://getdirectus.com

link
detaro 3115 days ago
All I see on their homepage is backend UI. A headless CMS has no client/visitor facing UI.
link
lsaferite 3115 days ago
Headless CMS in this context means it's just the CMS backend (the tail) and not a frontend (the head). The raw content is rendered to a FE view by something else.
link
thisacctforreal 3114 days ago
Back-end and front-end often mean server-side and client(browserside respectively, eg Front-end developer.

So to be clear, headless CMSs have an admin-facing front-end and back-end to manage content, but only an API for a process to render the content into HTML/CSS/JS for visitors.

That said, headless CMSs can be used for more than just websites.

link
lsaferite 3114 days ago
Hence the "in this context" part
link