Except something like 90% of revenue comes from 5% of "players" so it's obviously just what he told himself to placate his conscience that he wasn't ripping off addicts.
How is this different from Apps on the playstore ? Insurance/Banking/consultancy ? Or, I have to say, sometimes I wonder how the amounts people spend on music truly vary. The merchandising for most bands means that if you really want to spend millions on a band, you can (e.g. the "pharma bro" Wu-Tang clan saga). Bands themselves say that this is where most of their income comes from ...
This whale principle certainly seems to cover quite a bit of the economy.
Even movies are similar. You want to spend a million (or a few) on star wars ? Not a problem. [1]
From a psychological standpoint I would strongly suggest that you never make it your mission to save people from themselves. There's only 2 ways you come out of that experience: evil (lost belief in mankind, and therefore anything goes), or mad.
I'm just saying that, to varying extents, large portions of the economy are "taking advantage of" addicts. Certainly if you work for FANG, they all (including Amazon) have their addicts. As do things like reddit, in fact probably most sites.
You cannot let your life be controlled by "ethics" like this. It's not reasonable.
This whale principle certainly seems to cover quite a bit of the economy.
Even movies are similar. You want to spend a million (or a few) on star wars ? Not a problem. [1]
From a psychological standpoint I would strongly suggest that you never make it your mission to save people from themselves. There's only 2 ways you come out of that experience: evil (lost belief in mankind, and therefore anything goes), or mad.
[1] http://mentalfloss.com/article/53388/6-most-expensive-pieces...