[AdeptusAquinas]

It's pretty clear from the article and anyone who cares to glance at the news today that the 'freedom of speech activists' do plenty of silencing themselves. Afterall, the issue at Stanford was that minority groups were being causally belittled and excluded. But hey: no one is allowed to descriminate against the right to descriminate!

[rhapsodic]

>It's pretty clear from the article and anyone who cares to glance at the news today that the 'freedom of speech activists' do plenty of silencing themselves.

It's not clear to me. How about a few examples?

[blackbagboys]

This is nowhere in evidence in the article. Disagreement is not exclusion or silencing.