Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JumpCrisscross 3127 days ago
> It’s not acceptable to say you’ll invest in a company and then go fundraise to fulfill that commitment

When a VC “raises” capital, they don’t get a box of cash. Instead, their LPs sign commitments. When the VC signs a subscription agreement with a company, they “call” that capital from their LPs. LPs are then obligated to supply it promptly so the VC can meet its obligation to the company.

This is done to separate cash management and investment. (While the cash sits waiting, one investor may want it in CDs; another in Treasuries. Mingling that risk with the core activity of VCs, picking great ventures, isn’t worth it.)

OP is saying the LPs, as part of their commitment, may have had an out in their paperwork. VC signed subscription agreement. VC called money. LPs said “no, we’re exercising this clause to delay or not give you that money.”

TL; DR a round isn’t raised until it’s closed.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. It outlines a hypothetical and does not necessarily represent the facts and circumstances of 500 Startups.

1 comments

Yes, but you don’t invest money that isn’t closed.
> don’t invest money that isn’t closed

Are you talking to the VC or the company?

When a VC says they have “closed” a fund, it means they have collected commitments. (I have found no consistency in what companies mean by having “closed” a round.)