[elliotec]

I feel that the fact that the parent had a feeling specific to the topic at hand is completely relevant, and your comment warning against the "risk of harming the reputation" of this person, who already has a bad reputation, is not relevant to the discussion.

[borski]

The parent has nothing to do with this topic. This is about whether 500S can pay the money it owes to the startups they fund. The parent is purely insinuation and is not based in fact, nor is it relevant to the fund; rather, it is simply trying to throw shade at Dave McClure, who is no longer with the fund, regardless.

This is shown to be especially true by the fact that parent never even had a conversation with anyone at GOAP, as they didn't respond (by parent's admission).

[hitekker]

Not so much irrelevant as it is distracting; a tactic to defend the (increasingly-seeming) indefensible.