Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mindslight 3129 days ago
I'd rather not be fighting my fellow humans because they've been claimed by a different empire - either violently through the funding of outright war or nonviolently through economic wage slavery. Governments are unable to resist the siren song of the inflationary treadmill, as the alternative is to fall behind the others. Uniformly diminishing their ability to conscript (militarily or economically) is one actual step towards world peace.

(disclaimer: I'm not personally bullish on bitcoin itself)

1 comments

Inflation can be properly managed by responsible central banks. It's not really a problem.

Also "wage slavery" is perpetuated by private companies not governments, so not sure how you aim to eliminate that by killing governments.

> Inflation can be properly managed by responsible central banks. It's not really a problem.

But it isn't, so it is.

> "wage slavery"

Wage slavery is perpetuated by debasing the unit in which you are paid. That's inflation. I don't want to eliminate governments. I want governments to stick to the role of governing, not punishing people because they want to save to better themselves.

People need to work not because of inflation, but because they get a fixed amount of money and spend most of it on things they want.

Not only that, but wages largely track inflation so your argument fails.

> Not only that, but wages largely track inflation so your argument fails.

They might track 'inflation'. They don't track prices.

Wage over 20 years 2x. House price over 20 years 10x.

>> House price over 20 years 10x.

Mortgage payment over 20 years 2x. House prices vary inversely with interest rates. When you go to get a loan the bank figures out how much cash flow you've got and assumes some percentage will go to paying the loan back. They start from that monthly payment and figure out how much you can borrow at the current interest rate (this is where lower interest rates mean borrow more money for the same monthly payment) then you run off to but a house and everyone (seller, agent, appraiser, everyone) has an incentive to get you to spend as much as you possibly can. So ultimately you're 30 years of payments will be based on your income. How much of that money goes to the bank vs the seller depends on interest rates. Low rates mean higher prices and more money to the seller. High rates mean lower prices and more money to the lender.

This all stems from people living paycheck to paycheck too, so the affordability of things has nothing to do with price and everything to do with size of payments.

> Mortgage payment over 20 years 2x

Completely and utterly false.

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_united_states_of_...

Furthermore that attitude makes me physically sick. You are a debt slave providing the fruits of your labor to the banking industry, all priced at the maximum value that can be extracted for the longest period. All because inflation punishes savers.

Spot where inflation started to be managed by the central bank:

https://media.ycharts.com/charts/2dd4f9a7b087a1eb6f763d81a97...

Spot the part where hedonic quality adjustments started being made to the CPI.

More importantly, in your graph, spot where they removed house pricing from the CPI.

https://www.bls.gov/cpi/quality-adjustment/home.htm

HINT: 1983.