|
|
|
|
|
|
by pvg
5801 days ago
|
|
|
These become a lot more fun to read (after the 5th one or so) by replacing the debated term with something else. Let's say, 'pants', for instance - Yes, You Need Pants Don’t think about pants in terms of equity. [...]the ideal number of pants is two or three. I feel incredibly lucky to have my brilliant pants[...] Revel in the intensity of your pants team. Oh and if the author happens to be reading, it's 'for all intents and purposes' rather than 'intensive purposes'. |
|
|