|
|
|
|
|
by jamesrcole
3133 days ago
|
|
> There is no cost/benefit analysis here. You're literally doing a cost/benefit analysis. You seem to be assuming that such an analysis implies there there has to be substantial benefits, or something like that. (I'm not commenting here on whether they do or don't exist in the case of Facebook) |
|
1. Take person literally to a fault in order to create a counterpoint.
2. Say obviously true, yet embarrassingly vague things to defend that counterpoint.
3. Respond "I'm not talking about that" when any possibility of nuance would enter the discussion.