|
|
|
|
|
by jlukic
3129 days ago
|
|
Just my two cents here. When Eric is describing having to wake up at 5 am and work weekends to make Code Sponsor work even with the proceeds of 60% of all OS projects his ad network funded, it should be pretty clear the other 40% divided among many OS coders couldn’t be enough for their project’s development to feel sustainable. As much as I commend Eric on trying to find a solution to OS maintainability, I think he actually just reinvented something already available to OS developers, a niche tasteful ad network, I.e carbon ads <https://carbonads.net> something which many OS projects with a large enough audience already include to support development. |
|
What Code Sponsor is is a mashup of Carbon Ads, Open Collective and Read the Docs (with a hint of grassroots marketing demonstrated by Wesbos). The 40% was enough for developers. I paid one developer last month over $600. Two others earned over $400.
Finally, Code Sponsor was available to every open source project. The popularity of the project is what self-governed the amount of money they would receive.
Carbon Ads also does not provide any visibility into what is going on. I have taken extreme effort to give sponsors and developers full visibility into their traffic patterns. Daily statistics and charts. This allows sponsors to immediately know how their campaigns are doing and shift if necessary.
Carbon Ads is great, but they are a black box and sponsors want more.