|
|
|
|
|
by romwell
3133 days ago
|
|
Then there are outright broken sentences like this: >The 1980s saw an increase in threats capable to countering the SR-71, including improved enemy air defenses and the introduction of the MiG-31, which was armed with the R-33 air-to-air missile could intercept the Blackbird. This just breaks my mental parsing, since there are so many ways to fix this: 1. ..MiG, which, being armed with the R-33 missile, could intercept the Blackbird; 2. ..MiG, which was armed with the R-33 missile, and could intercept the Blackbird; 3. ..MiG, which was armed with the R-33 air-to-air missile, and therefore could intercept the Blackbird. (and so on) |
|