|
|
|
|
|
by nerdponx
3130 days ago
|
|
I think this kind of misses the mark in some cases, or at least ascribes causality where there's little evidence for it. Some alternative hypotheses about slides 20, 22 and 23: - The inSSIDer ad on the right looks got fewer clicks because the styling is outdated and obnoxious, whereas the one on the left is on-trend. - The "control sweat" ad is worse because the word "sweat" is right there in big letters, and that's distasteful. - The buttons with "free" got fewer clicks because they talk about money, not about the benefit of the product. Talking about money up-front is a warning sign to people, like they're overeager to prove the wrong thing to you. |
|
The more successful alternative had "my armpits are always wet" in the equivalent location.