Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lojack 3135 days ago
OTC markets would probably price his assets at a much lower value than current trade price because of the volume and reaction from the markets. Public would know because the only way to safely trade ETH without letting Vitalk continue to have access is via a transaction, which is publicly accessible. I don’t know if his wallet addresses are publicly known, but a $3.5 billion transfer wouldn’t go unnoticed. Markets would almost certainly react negatively to him liquidating.

That said OTC price of everything could still be over $1 billion.

1 comments

People don't know Vitalik's addresses. People estimate his worth and have no idea how much he kept or sold after the ICO in 2014 or at low prices in Ethereum.

Also, Ethereum won't mix inputs from different sending addresses, so it would have to be done in multiple transactions if he has multiple addresses. This would be indistinct from all the other transactions on the network.

OTC markets would try to price his assets at a lower value, and thats where you negotiate, and find counterparties yourself. If you know of several hedge funds that want to BUY ethereum without moving the markets UP, then you can sell straight to them, and tell the OTC trader that they won't get any volume and then you'll get a better price.