[KirinDave]

Okay. And I appreciate that, I'll look.

To make your process scientific, I'd like to suggest you add the following things to the post when you find it convenient:

1. A detailed explanation of your methodology, preferably with source code. This is so we can reproduce the tests. The ability to reproduce your work is a critical part of any process calling itself science.

2. A detailed list of the hardware you used & its deployment. (For reasons listed above).

3. Your raw data should be made available upon request so other people can work it as well.

P.S., aren't you concerned about I/O overhead with your superpoll proposal? It seems like the added resource allocation and the time spent in zeromq is going to eat up the small advantages you gain?