Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zedshaw 5797 days ago
I was hoping for e, but alas no luck.
2 comments

The best would be if it would be possible to code up superpoll to be adaptive, and in effect, benchmark itself to come to the same conclusion, dynamically. So if one day the kernel people fixed epoll to be better all the time, Mongrel2 would magically not use poll() much on systems using that kernel, and favour epoll.

Of course, that's often Kinda Hard To Do (tm). ;-)

It's pretty darn close to 1 - 1/e.
The first four digits of 1/0.6 would be 1666, the Annus Mirabilis. So you could compare Mongrel2's multiple request handlers to Isaac Newton first splitting light with a prism.