[bufordsharkley]

1) It can fund revenue for public goods with little to no deadweight loss 2) It targets "unearned wealth" instead of earned income 3) It grows with the growth of a municipal area, allowing for public finance that scales with the demands of a growing city 4) It can efficiently be used to pay for declining cost industries within a municipality (natural monopolies such as public transit) 5) It naturally is compatible with a UBI, insofar as you're merely distributing value which is considered to be commonly owned to all