To say that something is majority, you need to compare with the minority, minority was not provided.
Although I recognize a HN post can't possibly be able to enumerate and compare the magnitude of all possible ways the US influenced the world and tell objectively if it added more benefit than harm.
How did the US improve the stability of Middle East on the 1953 Coup d'Etat of Iran? Supporting Taliban in the 80s?
How helping overthrow (lots) of elected governments in South and Central America help them?
How is it that the US is a democracy champion but is more than happy to support cruel and corrupt military or religious dictatorships for it's own benefit? How does that help the world?
Are you really taking into account the implications of these actions and how they helped shape the current stage on your benefit-harm balance?
Although I recognize a HN post can't possibly be able to enumerate and compare the magnitude of all possible ways the US influenced the world and tell objectively if it added more benefit than harm.
How did the US improve the stability of Middle East on the 1953 Coup d'Etat of Iran? Supporting Taliban in the 80s?
How helping overthrow (lots) of elected governments in South and Central America help them?
How is it that the US is a democracy champion but is more than happy to support cruel and corrupt military or religious dictatorships for it's own benefit? How does that help the world?
Are you really taking into account the implications of these actions and how they helped shape the current stage on your benefit-harm balance?