|
|
|
|
|
by kalcode
3145 days ago
|
|
Why can't people get rich while making a difference? These same people could be working for other companies who are not fighting for our privacy and an open web. I agree that what is considered high paying salary is completely insane these days with wealth inequality and the idea that such sum of money if more than an individual will ever have use for. But that is a different topic. A non-profit status doesn't always mean charity. In Mozilla case they are a Foundation, another entity eligible for non-profit status. They have different goals than a charity. One of the things they do to earn this status is grants. And they have lots of grants. Now what is funny is you exclude the $0 the five Directors made. Also Mitchell Baker doesn't get their entire pay from salary. That why it is in the second column. Last salary report on her was $400k. Which is weird cause that was in 2014 the same as this public disclosure form. Not sure why you purposely left out the fact their salary isn't actually 1 millions. But total compensation. So their 'disingenuous' nature isn't so black and white as a headline 'non-profit chair has a 1 million dollar salary'. |
|
> A non-profit status doesn't always mean charity.
Many unambiguous charities have salaries just as high, and the same rationalizations.