[sitkack]

The chicken littles claiming this problem exists in the first place are publicly scared they are next. This they admit outright. I'd wager that people making these claims probably _do_ have this as a risk, for good reason.

[abiox]

this mindset seems a bit like a 'if you have nothing to hide...' view on privacy. they're only concerned because they're villains?

[sitkack]

You are putting words from a totally different argument in my mouth. Weak rhetoric.

[abiox]

your statement was thus:

> I'd wager that people making these claims probably _do_ have this as a risk, for good reason.

why do you think they have this as a risk? why for good reason? why do you wager this situation?

your phrasing seems like a sneering insinuation, but framed such that you can say it doesn't mean any one concrete thing, should someone respond. this seems like "weasel wording" and it seems disingenuous to reply the way you did.