[s73ver_]

Right, but the implication is that they'd be just fine meeting one on one with another man. That it's only women who get treated specially.

[Dylan16807]

Yes, that's the point. That this paranoia is bad for women. And the paranoia is all about a man with any element of power interacting with a woman. The first party's sexuality is somewhat relevant, but the latter's doesn't matter at all.

[s73ver_]

I'm sorry, but that paranoia is pure cowardice. If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything, then they do not deserve to be in that position, full stop.

[Dylan16807]

> that paranoia is pure cowardice

Sure.

> If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything

Uh, that's not what the paranoia is. The paranoia is about accusations.

[s73ver_]

And I don't buy that. People who aren't sexual predators don't have to worry about that.

[Dylan16807]

> have to worry

Fear isn't rational.

You can't imagine someone in this situation that's excessively worried about a very unlikely but possible occurrence, and acts based on that fear?

[s73ver_]

If they're that driven by fear, they do not deserve to be in that position. And if they're that afraid of it, it's probably because they know they're likely to act in that manner.

I have zero sympathy whatsoever for those cowards, and I extremely abhor the implied insinuation that women won't receive opportunities in the future unless they allow themselves to be harassed and shut up about it.

[abiox]

presumably, the rate of male v male harassment accusations is very low (at least relatively), and as such doesn't much play into risk aversion.