|
|
|
|
|
by asdgkknio
3143 days ago
|
|
I'm confused by it, too. The main reason I've preferred Firefox to Chrome for years has been performance. It's pretty much the same in responsiveness and uses far less memory. Chrome being the fastest browser is ancient history. |
|
Bloated websites (usually Google ones) would actually lock up the entire Firefox UI, and Windows would recognize the browser application as "Not responding" until the page finished loading. In the case of a super bloated site like the old Google+, that could be as much as twelve seconds non-responsive while all the cruft loaded up.
I am back on Firefox release channel now, and pretty satisfied with current performance, but looking forward to Quantum.