|
|
|
|
|
by BoiledCabbage
3148 days ago
|
|
Human based systems can fail in more ways, but are more resilient. There is less likely to be a systemic failure in a human based system. Similarly, assuming a nefarious actor it is much more challenging to hack a vote using a distributed human system than a digital one. |
|
About the second thing you've surely that cannot be true in all cases. A vote guarded by a mathematically difficult number theory problem can be hard to crack than a ballot box guarded by a grumpy human who feels he/she has better things to do. I believe one must not forget the cost of assembling such problems and maintaining such problems
Curious to know your take and redefinition do