|
|
|
|
|
by jdietrich
3148 days ago
|
|
8K is largely pointless as a broadcast format and marginal even as a digital cinema format. 4k is already at the outer limits of visual acuity. Someone with 20/20 vision can only resolve about 60 pixels per degree, so you need to be sitting six feet away from a 50" screen to even notice the difference between 1080p and 4k. Unless you're filling your entire visual field with pixels, 8k offers no appreciable benefit. What does matter a great deal is HDR and 10-bit colour. Human eyes can perceive about 20 stops of dynamic range, but the best cameras max out at about 15 stops and most TVs struggle to exceed 8 stops. A typical TV only covers about 40% of the visible colour gamut, with particularly pronounced deficiencies in green and cyan. The benefits of HDR are slightly harder to explain than "more pixels are better", but the difference is visible at first glance. |
|
Disagree. I see the pixels even from 7th row back at digital 4K theaters.