Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wavefunction 3146 days ago
>it is better to sue first than be tied up in court cases with people turning up over the next 20 years.

Better for who though?

4 comments

> Better for who though?

Settling land ownership disputes early and clearly is in the common interest.

> Better for who though?

Subjectively him, and that is why I am gathering he is (was) doing it, and I cannot blame him. These are not your "normal" titles, ownership of land is passed down through generations with little record as to the direct ownership of land.

For the person deciding whether to sue.
> Better for who though?

Everybody but the lawyers.

As much as I would like to protect native islanders and their lineage, I don't think it's in anyone's best interest to allow land to idle half in a strange state of title limbo. There are many countries in the Western Hemisphere (and even cities in the US) that are suffering for having poor property ownership recording or the claiming of ownership through inheritance. Haiti comes to mind, along with abandoned buildings in Detroit and Baltimore.