|
|
|
|
|
by snarfybarfy
3150 days ago
|
|
The product you seem to be talking about is not part of 'the market'. Otherwise competition would drive the price down to intrinsic cost + small profit (remember the 'invisible hand'?) 10 years and 1000's of lawyers to find out whether Microsoft is a monopoly? Give me a break! Just look at their income statement!
Profit margins of 30% and more for 30 or more years? Do you seriously believe nobody would or could do the same for 20% profits? A real market economy would tax away most of the excess profits after a certain number of years (depending on industry?). But then you would not have Apple and Microsoft and all your other beloved monopolists. Ps:
I'm a bit undecided but maybe it's OK for luxury products to not be part of the market. If you want to pay $200 more for an additional 1 GB on your iPhone when the price for 1 GB is $20, then it's no skin of my nose.
But please make sure Apple pays their taxes. |
|
How do you define 'excess profits'.
And BTW - yes - I really do believe 'nobody can compete with Microsoft'.
Do you realize how sophisticated those products are?
And for every MS product, there are tons of competitors.
MS doesn't just make a 'widget' - they depend upon the talent (and ability to evolve that), deep value chain integration, R&D - it's a constantly moving team.