|
|
|
|
|
by throwthisawayt
3150 days ago
|
|
Ok, your salary estimates for SF are completely off. Let me level set by saying I went to a bootcamp and have two years experience. I make 165K (25% higher than 130) and my 3 close bootcamp colleagues all make around the same. I don’t work for some hot company like Google - 95% of people reading this haven’t heard of us. And just to be clear this is all liquid compensation (cash, bonus, and public stock equity). So yes for me and my closest friends with comparable experience SF is by far the best option economically. Note as others have mentioned; I don’t think that will be the case when I start a family. |
|
I lived and worked in SF for nearly a decade until this year. I operated a company for a good portion of that time. I know what the market rates are.
Personal anecdotes doesn't mean much when the aggregate numbers disagree with you. Maybe you're special. Maybe you're lucky. You're probably underestimating what you'd make elsewhere. But I'll say this: if you're truly getting a significant fraction of your salary in liquid RSUs, you are at a public company, and are quite likely being paid above market.
If you are counting illiquid RSUs, you are doing funny math.