|
|
|
|
|
|
by wsy
3141 days ago
|
|
|
Your argument would be more convincing if brought as falsifiable science-style theory. In its current humanities-style argumentative form, you somewhat contradict yourself: either your argument holds power, then why do you dismiss this family of arguments as inferior? Or your argument doesn't hold power, then why would you expect us (or even yourself) to be convinced? |
|
|