|
|
|
|
|
|
by DennisP
5797 days ago
|
|
|
The second was a case where guards had already seen the incriminating content. Maybe defendants can still plead the 5th when the contents are unknown. In any case, if you can show that you weren't the one who encrypted the document, I don't see how you could be prosecuted for not doing the impossible. |
|
|