Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vortico 3150 days ago
This is a perfectly moral choice, assuming he has not taken significant contributions from others (or they have allowed this relicense, or granted copyright ownership of their contribution to him). Later in the Issue discussion, they attempt to put a name to the type of license. I propose "Freeware with source". Thoughts?
1 comments

They have already allowed the relicense by releasing their contributions under a permissive license such as MIT.
Oh yes, of course. Ignore my parenthetical statement then.