[ekianjo]

You can say we have had the very same thing with full state Powers that had nothing to do with Capitalism, since the beginning of History, so putting it on the back of "Capitalism" is kind of tenuous. Anybody or any organization in a position of ultimate power will go in that kind of behavior. Plus, the East India Company was pretty much a proxy for States involved in the area.

The point of capitalism is that you are supposed to have a lot more competition because of fragmentation.

[vvvv]

I think the opposite is true. Pure capitalistic free market naturally tends towards monopoly or collusion. State intervention is needed to ensure competition.

[jrs95]

And then corporate interests collude through and ultimately control the state, and we've arrived at an interesting system of two party democratic republican fascism