|
|
|
|
|
|
by vosper
3154 days ago
|
|
|
> But more importantly, it's time to stop giving developers the impression they aren't building a "real application" if they don't have an extremely complicated router library and a whole bunch of thunks and reducers. A thousand times, this. I am working on Redux-enabled app that answers "no" to all 5 of the questions to consider when trying to decide "do I have to put all of my state in Redux?" [0] IMO it's now all so much more complicated than it needs to be. Admittedly this is my first exposure to Redux, but rather than "you might not need Redux" I'm leaning towards "you almost definitely don't need Redux" [0] http://redux.js.org/docs/faq/OrganizingState.html |
|
|